Comparison
WebPT is a rehabilitation chart and practice system where your note, schedule and claim live, while PelvicPath is a thin between visit layer beside it that answers whether the home program actually got done.
These two are not substitutes. WebPT is built to be the system of record for a rehab therapy practice, and if you are in network with commercial payers and Medicare you need something in that category. PelvicPath does not write your note, run your schedule or send a claim. It delivers the pelvic home program, logs completions, collects symptom flags and hands you a summary you can paste into your own progress note. The real question is whether you need the between visit loop at all, not which of the two wins.
| What you are deciding | PelvicPath | WebPT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | A between visit home program and adherence layer for a pelvic caseload. | A rehabilitation focused chart and practice management system. |
| System of record | Not the chart. The summary is written so you can paste it into your own note. | Designed to be the record where clinical documentation lives for a therapy practice. |
| Scheduling and billing | Out of scope on purpose, so there is nothing to migrate. | Built around the front office workflow of an outpatient therapy practice. |
| Between visit patient contact | Daily program delivery, completion logging and symptom flags from the patient. | Oriented around the visit itself and the documentation that follows it. |
| Pelvic specificity | Content, symptom flags and program templates written for pelvic presentations only. | Built for outpatient rehabilitation broadly across therapy specialties. |
| Setup effort | A first home program takes a few minutes and there is no implementation project. | A practice system implies onboarding, template work and staff training. |
| Who it suits | One or two pelvic therapists who already have a chart they can live with. | Practices that want documentation, scheduling and billing under one roof. |
| Price shape | Flat monthly: Solo Therapist $45, Two Therapist $95, Clinic $189. | Priced as practice infrastructure; ask them for current terms. |
On the right is the kind of tool WebPT is and the job it is shaped around, rather than a list of what it includes at any given price. Any product moves on, so confirm the live details on their own pages first. PelvicPath is published by MLJ, SASU and this page is written by Jimenez Julien.
Chart systems are built around the visit: the evaluation, the daily note, the recertification, the claim. That is the correct center of gravity for the money side of a pelvic practice, and nothing here suggests you can run an in network clinic without one.
But the pelvic plan of care lives mostly outside the visit. Twenty six of every twenty eight days are the patient at home deciding whether to do her breathing work, whether the dilator step is tolerable, whether the urge suppression technique is worth trying at work. A chart records what you did. It was never designed to record what she did.
When a records request lands, the notes get read for medical necessity and measurable progress. Objective change is the strongest thing you can show, and the second strongest is a clear picture of the home program: what was prescribed, what was performed, what was modified and why.
A between visit summary gives you that in a form you can paste straight into a progress note, dated and specific. It will not rescue a thin note, but it turns the vaguest line in most pelvic documentation, patient reports compliance with home exercise program, into something with days and dosage attached.
The practical setup in most small pelvic clinics is straightforward. Chart and schedule stay where they are. At the end of the visit you send or adjust the home program in PelvicPath, and you read the caseload list once a week for gaps and symptom flags before clinic starts.
Because PelvicPath is not tied to any particular chart, changing documentation vendors later does not disturb the programs your patients are already running. That independence is the main reason small clinics keep the two layers separate rather than waiting for one system to do both.
No. It produces a between visit summary listing which days the patient completed her program, what she flagged and what changed in dosage. Most therapists paste that into the subjective or objective section of their own note. Your chart stays your chart.
You add a patient once in PelvicPath with the minimum needed to send a program. It is a short form rather than a duplicate intake, and it does not ask for insurance, authorization or claim details.
Nothing on the home program side changes. PelvicPath sits beside the chart rather than inside it, so a documentation migration does not interrupt the programs your patients are running or the logs already recorded against them.
Comparison
Medbridge is built for rehabilitation teams that want one prescribing and education library across every caseload in the building, while PelvicPath is built for the pelvic therapist who needs to know what got done between Tuesday and the visit two weeks later.
Comparison
HEP2go is for the therapist who wants to assemble a clear exercise handout in a couple of minutes, while PelvicPath is for the therapist who wants to know what happened to that handout over the next fourteen days.
A comparison table reads differently once your own postpartum and pelvic pain patients are in it. On a short call we build a three item program for a case you are treating this week, then show what the daily log and the between visit summary look like fourteen days on. If the other product suits how your clinic runs, we will tell you that on the call.