Comparison
PelvicPath vs HEP2go
HEP2go is for the therapist who wants to assemble a clear exercise handout in a couple of minutes, while PelvicPath is for the therapist who wants to know what happened to that handout over the next fourteen days.
Comparison
Medbridge is built for rehabilitation teams that want one prescribing and education library across every caseload in the building, while PelvicPath is built for the pelvic therapist who needs to know what got done between Tuesday and the visit two weeks later.
Medbridge is built for rehabilitation organizations that want one prescribing and education library covering every caseload in the building. PelvicPath is built for a pelvic clinic where one or two therapists carry the whole list and the real problem is the fourteen days between visits. If you treat shoulders and knees alongside pelvic floor, the broader library earns its place. If your caseload is postpartum, prolapse, urgency and pelvic pain, and you keep guessing at adherence, a tool that logs each day and flags symptoms will change more of your visits than a bigger catalog will.
| What you are deciding | PelvicPath | Medbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Who it is built for | Solo and two therapist pelvic clinics, where one person writes the program and reads the follow up. | Rehabilitation organizations across orthopedics, neurology, sports and other outpatient caseloads. |
| Scope of the content | Pelvic floor, core, breathing and bladder retraining work, kept deliberately small. | Broad rehabilitation content spanning many body regions and clinical specialties. |
| What happens between visits | Daily completion logging and symptom flags from the patient, summarized before her next visit. | Designed primarily around delivering the program and patient education rather than a single caseload reporting loop. |
| Setup effort | Templates for common pelvic presentations, so a first program takes a few minutes. | A larger library and more configuration, which suits a clinic with someone to own setup. |
| Language the patient sees | Written for pelvic symptoms including leakage, urgency, pressure and pain with penetration. | General rehabilitation language written to cover a wide range of conditions. |
| Fit with your documentation | Sits beside your chart as a between visit record you can paste into a progress note. | Suits clinics that want prescribing and education inside a broader platform footprint. |
| Who it suits at scale | One or two therapists tracking a personal pelvic caseload they know by name. | Multi discipline teams standardizing content and training across locations. |
| Price shape | Flat monthly by therapist count: Solo Therapist $45, Two Therapist $95, Clinic $189. | Priced as a broader platform; confirm current terms with them directly. |
On the right is the kind of tool Medbridge is and the job it is shaped around, rather than a list of what it includes at any given price. Software shifts month to month, so read their own pages before you commit. PelvicPath is published by MLJ, SASU and this page is written by Jimenez Julien.
Medbridge assumes a clinic with a range of caseloads and someone whose job includes keeping content and training organized. That is a reasonable assumption for a multi therapist rehab practice. It is a poor fit for a pelvic clinic where the same person does the internal exam, writes the program, answers the message about dilator size and reconciles the superbill before dinner.
PelvicPath assumes the opposite. You have thirty to sixty active patients, most spaced two or three weeks apart, and you cannot hold in your head who is doing quick flicks daily and who stopped after one bad night of urgency. The product is shaped around reading your own list quickly, not around administering content for other people.
Asking a postpartum patient at minute two whether she did her program produces a polite answer, not information. She says mostly, and you spend the next six minutes reconstructing dosage, position and what happened on the days she skipped. That reconstruction is where treatment time goes, visit after visit.
A daily log answers it before she arrives. You can see that she completed five of the last fourteen days, that the gap started the night she flagged urgency, and that she reported pain with the second dilator. You walk in with a plan instead of an interview, and the visit starts where it should.
Plenty of clinics keep a general rehabilitation library for their orthopedic caseload and run pelvic patients through PelvicPath. The two are not in conflict because they answer different questions. One helps you build the program, the other tells you whether it survived contact with a newborn, a full time job and a bad week.
If you do run both, pick one home for the pelvic program and stay there. Two versions of the same exercise list confuse a patient more than any missing feature ever will, and the confused patient is the one who quietly stops.
Not for a mixed caseload. PelvicPath carries pelvic floor, core, breathing and bladder retraining work, kept small on purpose so a program stays short enough to finish. If you also treat rotator cuffs and knees, keep a general library for those and use PelvicPath for the pelvic list.
Yes. Many pelvic therapists film their own cueing for down training or a dilator progression because the words matter more than the picture. You can attach your own instruction to a program item and the daily log behaves the same way.
PelvicPath has a Two Therapist tier at $95 and a Clinic tier at $189, so growing from one to two does not mean starting over. Medbridge is the safer answer if that second hire is an orthopedic therapist and you expect a mixed caseload rather than a pelvic specialty clinic.
Comparison
HEP2go is for the therapist who wants to assemble a clear exercise handout in a couple of minutes, while PelvicPath is for the therapist who wants to know what happened to that handout over the next fourteen days.
Comparison
WebPT is a rehabilitation chart and practice system where your note, schedule and claim live, while PelvicPath is a thin between visit layer beside it that answers whether the home program actually got done.
A comparison table reads differently once your own postpartum and pelvic pain patients are in it. On a short call we build a three item program for a case you are treating this week, then show what the daily log and the between visit summary look like fourteen days on. If the other product suits how your clinic runs, we will tell you that on the call.