Comparison
HEP2go is for the therapist who wants to assemble a clear exercise handout in a couple of minutes, while PelvicPath is for the therapist who wants to know what happened to that handout over the next fourteen days.
HEP2go is a fast program builder and for many pelvic therapists it is the first tool they ever used. If your only problem is producing a clear handout for patients who reliably do their program, a builder is enough and nothing here should change your mind. PelvicPath starts after the handout. It delivers the program day by day, records completions and symptom flags, and gives you a between visit summary. If your postpartum patients drift by week two, the gap you are trying to close is follow through, not handout quality.
| What you are deciding | PelvicPath | HEP2go |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Keep a pelvic home program running between visits and report back what actually got done. | Assemble an exercise handout quickly from a general rehabilitation catalog. |
| What the patient receives | A short daily list on her phone with a check off and a place to flag a symptom. | A prescribed exercise set to view or print, in the shape a builder produces. |
| What comes back to you | Daily completions, symptom flags and a between visit summary for each patient. | Built around handing the program out rather than reporting on what followed. |
| Pelvic content | Down training, quick flicks, dilator progressions, breathing and bladder retraining. | A general rehabilitation catalog covering many regions, with pelvic work among them. |
| Program length discipline | Templates stay short because three items done beats nine items ignored. | Length is entirely up to whoever is building the handout that day. |
| Who it suits | A pelvic clinic whose main leak is adherence in the fortnight between visits. | A therapist who mainly needs a fast, flexible handout builder for a mixed list. |
| Price shape | Flat monthly by therapist count: Solo Therapist $45, Two Therapist $95, Clinic $189. | Positioned as a low overhead builder; check their current terms directly. |
On the right is the kind of tool HEP2go is and the job it is shaped around, rather than a list of what it includes at any given price. Products change, so check the current details with them before you decide. PelvicPath is published by MLJ, SASU and this page is written by Jimenez Julien.
A well built handout solves comprehension. It tells the patient what a quick flick is, how long to hold, and what position to start in. That matters, and a good builder does it well. It does not tell you whether she did any of it on the four days her baby had a cold.
Follow through is a different problem with different causes: the program was too long, the dose was never said out loud, nothing anchored it to an existing routine, and no one checked in during the first week. Those are design and process failures, and no catalog size fixes them.
With a log in front of you, the first ninety seconds of a pelvic visit change completely. You already know the pattern of her fortnight, so you spend the time on the thing she came for: the leaking on the second mile, the pressure by evening, the return to lifting she keeps asking about.
It also changes what you progress. Progressing a program the patient never actually performed is how a plan of care ends at visit six. When you can see that she did five of fourteen days, the right move is usually to shorten, not to advance, and you can say that with evidence instead of instinct.
Logging works when the ask is tiny. Three items, one tap each, at a time of day she picked herself. A postpartum patient holding a baby in one arm will not open an app, find a program and type a note, and expecting her to is the same design mistake as a nine exercise program.
Tell her plainly what the log is for: so you can adjust the program without waiting two weeks, and so a bad night gets a phone call rather than a lecture. Patients log when they believe someone reads it, and stop when the check off disappears into nothing.
Not all of them, and partial logging is still far more information than a memory at the start of a visit. Programs kept to three items with a named time of day log best. A patient who records five of fourteen days has told you something real about her week.
Yes, and some therapists do exactly that for a while. Just make sure each pelvic patient receives one program from one place. Two versions of the same list is the fastest way to lose the habit you are trying to build.
No. The program opens in her phone browser from a link, which matters for a postpartum patient with one free hand. Any setup ritual done alone at home is where adherence tends to die before it starts.
Comparison
Medbridge is built for rehabilitation teams that want one prescribing and education library across every caseload in the building, while PelvicPath is built for the pelvic therapist who needs to know what got done between Tuesday and the visit two weeks later.
Comparison
WebPT is a rehabilitation chart and practice system where your note, schedule and claim live, while PelvicPath is a thin between visit layer beside it that answers whether the home program actually got done.
A comparison table reads differently once your own postpartum and pelvic pain patients are in it. On a short call we build a three item program for a case you are treating this week, then show what the daily log and the between visit summary look like fourteen days on. If the other product suits how your clinic runs, we will tell you that on the call.